By and large people are pretty satisfied with the level of service and the response of city services, so they don't see the need to form a neighborhood association.

It's probably not the best solution, but it was probably the most viable solution to avoid the least amount of problems.

Allowing him to do what he wants to do opens up the gate for things we don't want. The thing I'm struggling with is the outside display.

This is not justified. It was all wrong. The boy was coming in and all he wanted to do was tell his part of the story and he didn't get a chance.

We are in the proposal stage. We have a council subcommittee working through the details on the length of lease, profit-sharing and what goes into the lease along with prohibitive advertising.

Wireless is really kind of where everyone's going.

Have we always made everybody happy? Probably not. But I don't know a situation where you can always make everybody happy.

We didn't want to look at a parcel in isolation because it has a domino effect.

(There are) no construction-related issues with the surrounding property owners and the super Wal-Mart development, so we think it's going fairly well.